When Lomography announced its Fantôme and Babylon Kino films, I hesitated at first, then went ahead and ordered 5 rolls of each. I wasn’t too excited about some slow black & white film, but I appreciate what Lomography are doing, and want to support new (and newly available thanks to repackaging) film stocks.

They took awhile to come, and waited a bit before trying one, but then, one Saturday in June 2020, as my darling wife and I prepared for a scenic drive I grabbed a roll, loaded it into the FM3a, attached the Nikon 105mm f/2.5, and threw caution to the wind…

This moonscape was the best picture I made on that drive, the near-deserted downtown area of St. Jo, Texas, where we paused for a few minutes.

Whoa, Contrast…. Sheesh. It’s either white or black. What the?

Well, I think development was part of my problem. I waited until September to develop this roll, and I developed it semi-stand in Rodinal (1:100, 60 minutes, 4 inversions at start and at 30 minutes). In my limited hunting, there were no examples of stand developed Fantôme, and, well, perhaps with good reason.

Everything I got had essentially two tones: black and white. Sure, it’s a black & white film, but most black & white films include a range of greys in between.

Not the Fantôme, though, not stand developed in Rodinal, anyway.

I had some limited success with plant life in the back yard and elsewhere.

But, sheesh. The contrast!

I was wholly disgusted by these and posted a few to Twitter in response to a #filmtober question from Jason Avery.

Other than that, I was happy to keep this set of mostly failures to myself.

Fantôme: 1 / James: 0

Then, in January 2020, I decided to get over it and shot a couple more rolls.

Rather than make this a long honking post full of twists and turns, I’m going to leave you in suspense for a bit. So stay tuned for the next episode in ma bataille avec le Fantôme.

Leave a comment

Say Something!

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

%d bloggers like this: